Land and its use has been a
controversial subject since the beginning of time. In the past, the common
property problem and pastoralist economic behavior has been a controversial
issue. The article that we read dealing with this issue takes place around the
world. Common property can easily be used by individual owners of livestock for
personal economic gain, and for the insurance against risk. When it is not the
land that is being used by is not personally owned by the herder, there will
not be as much of a financial risk if they do not have to worry about paying
for the upkeep of the land as well. Unfortunately, livestock can lead to the
degradation of the land, which can devalue the land. All of this degradation is
manmade, so the optimal environmental solution is to avoid unnatural practices
to keep the land pristine.
Common property is a state
owned property that allows a share of land use between peasants and nomads. Commonly
owned property means that the community owns the property, and sets the rules
for how they want to use it. The property has been especially useful for
farmer’s sheep to graze on over time, when it (the name of an organization in
Fontecchio) is allowed for them to do so.
Often times, livestock graze
when grasses are germinating, which means the grass doesn’t grow back as well
during the off-season when livestock graze elsewhere. It is therefore necessary
to set sanctions to make sure that there are regulations on the amount of time
the livestock can spend in one place. Herders are given the task of making sure
that their cattle move, and the pasture is not degraded.
When our class visited the
Marcelli Formaggi farm, we saw this problem in action. With the pigs, donkeys,
and 1,000+ sheep, the degradation of land is quite an issue. Making sure that
the sheep stay on their 1,600 hectares that the farm is made up of is critical
to avoid degrading the surrounding municipality land. The farm also has to be
careful to avoid overcrowding their land with sheep, since drought can also be
an issue for the livestock if too few resources are left in an emergency.
Even in the U.S. today, we
can see similar examples of common property being used for personal economic
gain by the example of Cliven Bundy and his sons, where they decided to use
federal land for their own cattle to graze on, without the permission of the
common land owners (the government). Free riding is an issue that is presented
when individuals are able to take advantage of such private property (or
commonly/community owned property). The common property theory is failing if it
is not being enforced. It is working much better in the case of Fontecchio,
where the people are paying for the use of their land, but in the U.S., there
has been more of a struggle of imposing the permit costs to its residents. With
municipalities, farmers have been able to take advantage of such land for a
long time.
No comments:
Post a Comment