The most established difference
as an economy evolves is the personalization of the transaction, which can be
seen through institutions such as airports. I have visited a variety of
airports in my short life, the smallest of which is Dickinson Theodore
Roosevelt Regional Airport. With five gates and just one or two TSA lines, my
experience at this airport was one of the most personalized interactions I have
ever encountered. My father’s side of the family lives nearby on a farm in
Regent, North Dakota, and the airport reflects the rural aesthetic of the area.
When each individual passenger accounts for a larger percentage of the total
traffic through the terminal, more attention is paid to each person. The result
is a personalized situation for each transaction of the experience, from
checking one’s bag, to going through security, to the replacement of a store
with a solitary vending machine.
As I sit amongst my classmates
at our gate in the SeaTac airport, I cannot help but reflect on the experience
of arriving at my current seat. I checked in on a kiosk, one amongst dozens to
request the passenger’s confirmation number and print a boarding pass. It wasn’t
until I checked my bag that I first spoke to an airline employee, though if one
is not checking a bag, as many choose to do, no human interaction would be
required. No fewer than seven TSA agents were present in my lane for security,
but over half of those were focused on the screen revealing the contents of my
bag via the x-ray machine. I moved on to the terminal and the rows of shops
peddling snacks, water bottles, books, meals, medications, and more. Each shop
and facility is strategically placed to meet the needs of any passenger within
a couple hundred meters. Sitting at the gate, I realize nearly all interactions
may be automated within a few years and personalization of the transaction
completely lost.
The lack of personalization is
not always to be grieved. If SeaTac operated in a manner similar to Dickinson airport
and allowed the same amount of informal interactions, the time of each
passenger spent in the airport would increase exponentially. People would miss
their flights, airplanes would get backed up waiting for passengers, wages to
airport employees would soar, and SeaTac would lose money. To serve the needs
of each individual, the airport must standardize the interactions with each passenger,
requiring fewer employees and decreasing the passenger time spent in lines
prior to the flight. In this regard, the transactions and methodology of the
SeaTac airport meets the needs of its patrons just as that of the Dickinson
airport meets the needs of its patrons through increased personalization.
At some point in time, the SeaTac
airport likely looked similar to the Dickinson airport at present, a handful of
gates, one or two contributing airlines, and a coffee shop. As the Seattle
metropolitan area grew, so too did the airport, gaining economies of scale by
grouping transactions and automating systems. Growing economies likewise must
assess the needs, and size, of their respective constituencies. Port towns focus
on their trade and mercantilism. Villages rich in natural resources develop large
harvesting and mining operations. Fishing towns build large naval fleets and tourist
traps provide hospitality facilities. The success, or failure, of each
community depends on their response to their evolving economies.
It’s Day 1 and we’re happy to be
setting out on our adventure. Thank you for following us on this exciting
journey! The first photo is an aerial view of Dickinson airport, the second is
an aerial view of SeaTac (both generously provided by Google Maps), and the third is a group photo taken at our gate.
No comments:
Post a Comment